State v. Nat Villiam Wright

Defendant bring forward th following assignments, to wit: (1) The court erred in permitting the prosecuting witness to identify defendant as her assailant because such in-court identification was based upon the out-of-court confrontation at the police station following her abortive attempt to identify him in a line-up, no counsel being present to represent him; (2) the court erred in permitting Officers Upchurch and King to testify regarding defendants inculpatory statements to them, no counsel being present to represent him; (3) the court erred in failing to nonsuit, and (4) the court erred in failing to charge on circumstantial evidence.