State West Virginia v. Roger Watson
1980.WV.173, 264 S.E.2D 628, 164 W.VA. 642
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
"A defendant must be allowed an in camera hearing on the admissibility of a pending in-court identification when he challenges it because the witness was a party to pre-trial identification procedures that were allegedly constitutionally infirm." Syllabus Point 6, State v. Pratt, W.Va. , 244 S.E.2d 227 (1978).
More Books by Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Battle v. Memorial Hospital At Gulfport
2000
Rizzo v. Children's World Learning Centers
1999
Kee v. City of Rowlett Texas
2001
United States V. Abrego
1998
Martin''s Herend Imports Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading usa
1997
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Inc. v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Inc.
1997