![Tart v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Tart v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Tart v. State
634 P.2D 750, 1981 OK CR 113, 1981.OK.0040281
-
- US$0.99
-
- US$0.99
来自出版社的简介
2 The crucial issue raised by the appellant is alleged prosecutorial misconduct. The cornerstone of American jurisprudence is the right to be afforded a fair and impartial trial. This right becomes meaningless if the State is allowed to make inflammatory and prejudicial arguments. Prosecutorial comments should be confined to the evidence presented at trial and any reasonable inferences that can be fairly drawn therefrom. This standard allows the prosecutor wide latitude in presenting his case with force and vigor.