![Texaco v. Charles R. Wolfe](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Texaco v. Charles R. Wolfe](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Texaco v. Charles R. Wolfe
TX.40281; 601 S.W.2d 737 (1980)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
On Motion For Rehearing On its motion for rehearing, Texaco argues that this court erred in holding that there were no pleadings to support a judgment for it on the theory that Charles R. Wolfe was liable as a partner for the debts of Wolfe Construction Company. Texaco also asserts that we erred in holding that Charles R. Wolfe was not liable to it on the original credit card application. Texaco's first amended original petition reads in pertinent part as follows: