The Constitution in Wartime The Constitution in Wartime
Constitutional Conflicts

The Constitution in Wartime

Beyond Alarmism and Complacency

    • $34.99
    • $34.99

Publisher Description

Most recent discussion of the United States Constitution and war—both the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq—has been dominated by two diametrically opposed views: the alarmism of those who see many current policies as portending gross restrictions on American civil liberties, and the complacency of those who see these same policies as entirely reasonable accommodations to the new realities of national security. Whatever their contributions to the public discussion and policy-making processes, these voices contribute little to an understanding of the real constitutional issues raised by war. Providing the historical and legal context needed to assess competing claims, The Constitution in Wartime identifies and explains the complexities of the important constitutional issues brought to the fore by wartime actions and policies. Twelve prominent legal scholars and political scientists combine broad overviews of U.S. history and contemporary policy with detailed yet accessible analyses of legal issues of pressing concern today.Some of the essays are broad in scope, reflecting on national character, patriotism, and political theory; exploring whether war and republican government are compatible; and considering in what sense we can be said to be in wartime circumstances today. Others are more specific, examining the roles of Congress, the presidency, the courts, and the international legal community. Throughout the collection, balanced, unbiased analysis leads to some surprising conclusions, one of which is that wartime conditions have sometimes increased, rather than curtailed, civil rights and civil liberties. For instance, during the cold war, government officials regarded measures aimed at expanding African Americans’ freedom at home as crucial to improving America’s image abroad.

Contributors. Sotirios Barber, Mark Brandon, James E. Fleming, Mark Graber, Samuel Issacharoff, David Luban, Richard H. Pildes, Eric Posner, Peter Spiro, William Michael Treanor, Mark Tushnet, Adrian Vermeule

  • GENRE
    Professional & Technical
    RELEASED
    2005
    January 26
    LANGUAGE
    EN
    English
    LENGTH
    272
    Pages
    PUBLISHER
    Duke University Press
    SELLER
    Duke University Press
    SIZE
    1
    MB
    The Constitution In Peril: The Perpetual Growth of the Imperial Presidency During Wartime and the Subversion of Constitutional Checks and Balances The Constitution In Peril: The Perpetual Growth of the Imperial Presidency During Wartime and the Subversion of Constitutional Checks and Balances
    2011
    What Should Constitutions Do? What Should Constitutions Do?
    2014
    In Defense of the Constitution In Defense of the Constitution
    1997
    Liberty and Order Liberty and Order
    2004
    Liberty and Order Liberty and Order
    2004
    The Federalist Papers The Federalist Papers
    2016
    In the Balance In the Balance
    2013
    Taking Back the Constitution Taking Back the Constitution
    2020
    A Court Divided A Court Divided
    2005
    Why the Constitution Matters Why the Constitution Matters
    2010
    Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?
    2018
    Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts
    2000
    The Militia and the Right to Arms, or, How the Second Amendment Fell Silent The Militia and the Right to Arms, or, How the Second Amendment Fell Silent
    2003
    Truman and the Steel Seizure Case Truman and the Steel Seizure Case
    1994
    Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, & the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, & the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal
    2000
    Violence As Obscenity Violence As Obscenity
    1996
    A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court
    1995
    Free Speech, The People's Darling Privilege Free Speech, The People's Darling Privilege
    2000