The Distinction between Falsification and Refutation in the Demarcation Problem of Karl Popper The Distinction between Falsification and Refutation in the Demarcation Problem of Karl Popper

The Distinction between Falsification and Refutation in the Demarcation Problem of Karl Popper

Publisher Description

Despite the criticism of Karl Popper's falsifiability theory for the demarcation between science and non-science, mainly pseudo-science, this criterion is still very useful, and perfectly valid after it was perfected by Popper and his followers. Moreover, even in his original version, considered by Lakatos as "dogmatic", Popper did not assert that this methodology is an absolute demarcation criterion: a single counter-example is not enough to falsify a theory; a theory can legitimately be saved from falsification by introducing an auxiliary hypothesis. Compared to Kuhn's theory of revolutions, which he himself later dissociated from it transforming it into a theory of "micro-revolutions," I consider that Popper's demarcation methodology, along with the subsequent development proposed by him, including the corroboration and the verisimilitude, though imperfect, is not only valid today, but it is still the best demarcation methodology. For argumentation, I used the main works of Popper dealing with this issue, and his main critics and supporters. After a brief presentation of Karl Popper, and an introduction to the demarcation problem and the falsification methodology, I review the main criticisms and the arguments of his supporters, emphasizing the idea that Popper has never put the sign of equality between falsification and rejection. Finally, I present my own conclusions on this issue.

Keywords: Karl Popper, falsifiability, falsification, demarcation problem, pseudo-science

CONTENTS

Abstract
Introduction
1 The demarcation problem
2 Pseudoscience
3 Falsifiability
4 Falsification and refutation
5 Extension of falsifiability
6 Criticism of falsifiability
7 Support of falsifiability
8 The current trend
Conclusions
Bibliography
Notes

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22522.54725

GENRE
Nonfiction
RELEASED
2019
March 7
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
48
Pages
PUBLISHER
Nicolae Sfetcu
SELLER
Draft2Digital, LLC
SIZE
119.9
KB
Theory and Reality Theory and Reality
2021
Charles Peirce's Theory of Scientific Method Charles Peirce's Theory of Scientific Method
2018
Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction
2002
Peirce's Philosophical Perspectives Peirce's Philosophical Perspectives
2018
Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism
2018
The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited
2022
Emotions and Emotional Intelligence in Organizations Emotions and Emotional Intelligence in Organizations
2020
Reptiles Reptiles
2011
Philosophy of Blockchain Technology: Ontologies Philosophy of Blockchain Technology: Ontologies
2019
Plato, The Republic: On Justice – Dialectics and Education Plato, The Republic: On Justice – Dialectics and Education
2022
Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card Bridge Bidding - Standard American Yellow Card
2014
Epistemology of Intelligence Agencies Epistemology of Intelligence Agencies
2019
Gesammelte Werke: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung + Parerga und Paralipomena + Eristische Dialektik + Vorlesungen + Abhandlungen und mehr Gesammelte Werke: Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung + Parerga und Paralipomena + Eristische Dialektik + Vorlesungen + Abhandlungen und mehr
2014
The Essential UCLA School of Economics The Essential UCLA School of Economics
2021
The Essential Joseph Schumpeter The Essential Joseph Schumpeter
2020
A treatise on the social compact: or the principles of politic law. By J. J. Rousseau, ... A treatise on the social compact: or the principles of politic law. By J. J. Rousseau, ...
1764
Wissenschaft der Logik V2 Wissenschaft der Logik V2
2013
The Essential Austrian Economics The Essential Austrian Economics
2020