The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action. The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action.

The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action‪.‬

Notre Dame Law Review 2011, July, 86, 3

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

INTRODUCTION Observers typically cast litigation and arbitration in contrast to one another. Litigation takes place under off-the-rack rules prescribed by public law--for the federal courts, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By contrast, arbitration is a creature of the private law of contracts and part of the larger realm of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The term "alternative" highlights the contrast with litigation. One prominent concern in recent years posits that ADR mechanisms have given rise to a troubling body of "contract procedure" (1) that shunts off to an opaque, privatized forum many kinds of civil disputes that previously would have formed the grist for the open, public process of litigation. On this account, litigation and arbitration comprise dichotomous, even rivalrous, regimes for the resolution of civil claims.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2011
July 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
116
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Notre Dame Law School
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
409.7
KB
Turning Miranda Right Side up: Post-Waiver Invocations and the Need to Update the Miranda Warnings. Turning Miranda Right Side up: Post-Waiver Invocations and the Need to Update the Miranda Warnings.
2011
"Preserving" Civil RICO: How the Model Unfair Trade Practices Act Affects Rico's Private Right of Action Under the Mccarran-Ferguson Act. "Preserving" Civil RICO: How the Model Unfair Trade Practices Act Affects Rico's Private Right of Action Under the Mccarran-Ferguson Act.
2011
Witnessing the Witness: The Case for Exclusion of Eyewitness Expert Testimony. Witnessing the Witness: The Case for Exclusion of Eyewitness Expert Testimony.
2011
Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: The Objective Standard for Judicial Recusal. Caperton V. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: The Objective Standard for Judicial Recusal.
2011
The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice. The False Promise of Adolescent Brain Science in Juvenile Justice.
2009
Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges? Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?
2009