The Stolen Crown
Treachery, Deceit, and the Death of the Tudor Dynasty
-
-
5.0 • 1 Rating
-
-
- $14.99
Publisher Description
“Compelling and brilliant—don’t miss it!”—Alison Weir
From the acclaimed royal historian, the dramatic and untold story of the lie about the controversial succession that ended the Tudor era and changed the course of British history
In the long and dramatic annals of British history, no transition from one monarch to another has been as fraught and consequential as that which ended the Tudor dynasty and launched the Stuart in March 1603. At her death, Elizabeth I had reigned for 44 turbulent years, facing many threats, whether external from Spain or internal from her cousin Mary, Queen of Scots. But no danger was greater than the uncertainty over who would succeed her, which only intensified as her reign lengthened. Her unwillingness to marry or name a successor gave rise to fierce rivalry between blood claimants to the throne—Mary and her son, James VI of Scotland, Arbella Stuart, Lady Katherine Grey, Henry Hastings, and more—which threatened to destabilize the monarchy.
As acclaimed Tudor historian Tracy Borman reveals in The Stolen Crown, according to Elizabeth’s earliest biographer, William Camden, in his history of her reign, on her deathbed the queen indicated James was her chosen heir, and indeed he did become king soon after she died. That endorsement has been accepted as fact for more than four centuries. However, recent analysis of Camden’s original manuscript shows key passages were pasted over and rewritten to burnish James’ legacy. The newly-uncovered pages make clear not only that Elizabeth’s naming of James never happened, but that James, uncertain he would ever gain the British throne, was even suspected of sending an assassin to London to kill the queen. Had all this been known at the time, the English people—bitter enemies with Scotland for centuries—might well not have accepted James as their king, with unimagined ramifications.
Inspired by the revelations over Camden’s manuscript, Borman sheds rare new light on Elizabeth’s historic reign, chronicling it through the lens of the various claimants who, over decades, sought the throne of the only English monarch not to make provision for her successor. The consequences were immense. Not only did James upend Elizabeth’s glittering court, but the illegitimacy of his claim to the throne, which Camden suppressed, found full expression in the catastrophic reign of James’ son and successor, Charles I. His execution in 1649 shocked the world and destroyed the monarchy fewer than 50 years after Elizabeth died, changing the course of British and world history.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Historians have long considered the ascension of Elizabeth I's successor, James I, a relatively settled matter ahead of Elizabeth's death, but this meticulous account from historian Borman (Anne Boleyn & Elizabeth I) suggests a thornier transition. Drawing on a fresh interpretation of royal correspondence, Borman argues that James stole the crown. She lays out her case via an exploration of several technocratic, religious, and interpersonal intrigues. These include the fact that royal succession had been "profoundly destabiliz" by Elizabeth's father, Henry VIII, who established that a sovereign could nominate their successor. Elizabeth chose to strategically keep her succession plans secret, effectively inciting a crew of claimants attempting to curry favor. Another quirk was a 14th-century law decreeing "those not born on English soil" couldn't inherit a title, which made James—then James VI of Scotland—a front-runner to those who believed in England's "suzerainty" over Scotland. Yet in a immersive close read of their letters, Borman illustrates how, much to James's chagrin, the two royals' relationship deteriorated over time, due to Elizabeth's dislike of James's misogyny, pro-Catholic policies, and desire for an equal English-Scottish union. The charge of "theft," however, is undermined by the fact that James had "no single, strong competitor" when Elizabeth died. Still, this makes for an enthralling and detailed window into royal family drama.