The Value of Life The Value of Life

The Value of Life

Biological Diversity And Human Society

    • $52.99
    • $52.99

Publisher Description

The Value of Life is an exploration of the actual and perceived importance of biological diversity for human beings and society. Stephen R. Kellert identifies ten basic values, which he describes as biologically based, inherent human tendencies that are greatly influenced and moderated by culture, learning, and experience. Drawing on 20 years of original research, he considers:

the universal basis for how humans value nature
differences in those values by gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and geographic location
how environment-related activities affect values
variation in values relating to different species
how vlaues vary across cultures
policy and management implications

Throughout the book, Kellert argues that the preservation of biodiversity is fundamentally linked to human well-being in the largest sense as he illustrates the importance of biological diversity to the human sociocultural and psychological condition.

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2013
April 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
282
Pages
PUBLISHER
Island Press
SELLER
Chicago Distribution Center
SIZE
5.2
MB

More Books Like This

From Biocultural Homogenization to Biocultural Conservation From Biocultural Homogenization to Biocultural Conservation
2019
Ecological Challenges and Conservation Conundrums Ecological Challenges and Conservation Conundrums
2016
Conservation Social Science Conservation Social Science
2023
Earth Stewardship Earth Stewardship
2015
Positive Ecology Positive Ecology
2018
Wildlife Tourism, Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters Wildlife Tourism, Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters
2017

More Books by Stephen R. Kellert

Biophilic Design Biophilic Design
2011
Birthright Birthright
2012
Nature by Design Nature by Design
2018
Building for Life Building for Life
2012
The Good in Nature and Humanity The Good in Nature and Humanity
2013
The Biophilia Hypothesis The Biophilia Hypothesis
2013