Trogun v. Fruchtman Trogun v. Fruchtman

Trogun v. Fruchtman

1973.WI.150, 207 N.W.2D 297, 58 WIS. 2D 569

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This is a medical malpractice case. Nathan Trogun, plaintiff-appellant, was a patient of defendant-respondent, Dr. Robert Fruchtman, a specialist in internal medicine, from 1965 until September, 1968. In November, 1966, Dr. Fruchtman, based upon appellants prior medical records and certain tests revealing a premature arteriosclerotic condition, diagnosed Trogun as "possibly a diabetic" and placed him on a 1,500 calorie per day diet. Subsequently this diet was increased to 2,000 calories per day. In October, 1967, Dr. Fruchtman prescribed 100 milligrams of a diabetes medicine, Diabenese, for appellant and continued the diet.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1973
May 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
42
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
71.8
KB
Mecca Temple of Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of Mystic Shrine v. Darrock. Mecca Temple of Ancient Arabic Order of Nobles of Mystic Shrine v. Darrock.
1944
Sidis v. Corporation. Sidis v. Corporation.
1940
Ferguson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Ferguson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
1992
Bailey v. State Bailey v. State
1974
Original Ballet Russe Ltd. V. Ballet Theatre Inc. Original Ballet Russe Ltd. V. Ballet Theatre Inc.
1943
United States v. Fatico United States v. Fatico
1978