Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside) Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)

Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside‪)‬

Insurance Advocate 2010, April 5

Lawrence N. Rogak
    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

This decision is a lesson and a warning for defense attorneys. It is also a case where the dissent is much more enlightening than the majority ruling. In this no fault suit, plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and defendant failed to submit opposition. Civil Court, Queens County, granted plaintiffs' motion on default, and plaintiffs entered judgment. Defendant moved to vacate the default judgment, and the Civil Court granted defendant's motion. This appeal by plaintiffs ensued, and the Appellate Term reversed.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2010
April 5
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
CINN Group, Inc.
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
75.5
KB

More Books Like This

Default Denied in PIP/UM Subro Suit for Failure to Plead Essential Facts (Courtside) Default Denied in PIP/UM Subro Suit for Failure to Plead Essential Facts (Courtside)
Default Denied in PIP/UM Subro Suit for Failure to Plead Essential Facts (Courtside)
2011
Is This a Federal Traffic Ticket? Is This a Federal Traffic Ticket?
Is This a Federal Traffic Ticket?
2010
Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda Or Indifference? Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda Or Indifference?
Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda Or Indifference?
2011
Editorial: Sham Peer Review: The Fifth Circuit Poliner Decision (Editorial) Editorial: Sham Peer Review: The Fifth Circuit Poliner Decision (Editorial)
Editorial: Sham Peer Review: The Fifth Circuit Poliner Decision (Editorial)
2008
Disney, Good Faith, And Structural Bias. Disney, Good Faith, And Structural Bias.
Disney, Good Faith, And Structural Bias.
2007
The Undercivilization of Corporate Law. The Undercivilization of Corporate Law.
The Undercivilization of Corporate Law.
2008

More Books by Lawrence N. Rogak

Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside) Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)
Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)
2010
Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside) Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)
Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)
2010
Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath) Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)
Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)
2010
Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside) Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)
Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)
2010
Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside) Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)
Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)
2010
Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside) Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)
Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)
2010