[U] Corris V. Peck

¶1. Barton Peck, individually and on behalf of the Rose Peck Trust, appeals from the judgment and orders of the trial court, dismissing his counterclaim with prejudice, denying his motions after verdict, and awarding $18,464.06 plus costs to Robert B. Corris, S.C. Peck contends that the jury's verdict was perverse and that the trial court erred in granting Corris's motion for summary judgment on Peck's counterclaim of professional malpractice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in determining that the verdict was not perverse, and Peck's counterclaim of professional malpractice was properly denied, we affirm.