[U] Gates v. Seattle [U] Gates v. Seattle

[U] Gates v. Seattle

102 WASH.APP. 1024, 103 WASH.APP. 160, 10 P.3D 435, 2000.WA.0043309

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

We are asked to decide whether a secular court has jurisdiction over an employment contract claim against the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle where the plaintiff, a pastoral assistant for liturgy and music, claims the pastor insisted he do more work than he had agreed to perform. Because hearing the dispute would necessarily entangle the court in matters of church doctrine and practice, we conclude it was properly dismissed on summary judgment for lack of jurisdiction. Summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine issue of fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing the order, we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. City of Seattle v. State Dept. of Labor and Industries, 136 Wn.2d 693, 696-97, 965 P.2d 619 (1998).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
September 5
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
59
KB

More Books by Washington Court of Appeals

[U] State v. Weir [U] State v. Weir
2000
[U] Gehlen v. Snohomish County Public Hospital Dist. No. 1 [U] Gehlen v. Snohomish County Public Hospital Dist. No. 1
2001
[U] State v. Markishtum [U] State v. Markishtum
2001
[U] State v. Loukaitis [U] State v. Loukaitis
1999
United States Tobacco Sales And Marketing Company United States Tobacco Sales And Marketing Company
1999
Funkhouser V. Wilson Funkhouser V. Wilson
1998