Understanding and Interpreting Effect Size Measures (Research Note) (Report) Understanding and Interpreting Effect Size Measures (Research Note) (Report)

Understanding and Interpreting Effect Size Measures (Research Note) (Report‪)‬

Social Work Research 2007, Dec, 31, 4

    • US$5.99
    • US$5.99

출판사 설명

Statistical methods are the hallmark of quantitative research. Examining whether a result is statistically significant is standard content in social work research statistics courses. In all of social science, statistical significance testing has been the accepted procedure for examining results. Despite ongoing efforts aimed at encouraging researchers to report some index of magnitude that is not directly affected by sample size--for example, effect size statistical significance testing appears to remain the standard. In 1994, the APA Publication Manual provided "encouragement" to authors to report effect sizes with little impact (see for example Keselman et al., 1998; Kirk, 1996; Thompson & Snyder, 1998). The current Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) states that "it is almost always necessary to include some index of effect size or strength of relationship" (p. 25). This position was influenced by the APA Task Force on Statistical Methods that recommended researchers report alpha levels and effect sizes (Wilkinson &Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999). This was also the stance advocated by Dr. Jacob Cohen (1990), statistical power expert, who argued that "the primary product of a research inquiry is one of measures of effect size, not p values" (p. 12). The field has slowly responded and effect sizes are increasingly more visible (Fidler et al., 2005; Vacha-Haase & Thompson, 2004). Indeed, some journal editors, especially in psychology, now require authors to report effect size measures (Harris, 2003; Snyder, 2000; Trusty, Thompson, & Petrocelli, 2004). The reporting of effect size measures is also increasing in social work journals, however, it is still common to find studies void of effect size indices (for example, Claiborne, 2006; Engelhardt, Toseland, Goa, & Banks, 2006; Padgett, Gulcur, & Tsemberis, 2006; Perry, 2006). There do not appear to be any social work journals that require effect size reporting.

장르
논픽션
출시일
2007년
12월 1일
언어
EN
영어
길이
17
페이지
출판사
National Association of Social Workers
판매자
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
크기
195.8
KB
Research Design and Analysis Research Design and Analysis
2019년
Key Concepts in Measurement Key Concepts in Measurement
2015년
Multilevel Modeling of Social Problems Multilevel Modeling of Social Problems
2011년
Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research
2013년
Categorical Statistics for Communication Research Categorical Statistics for Communication Research
2016년
Experimental Methods in Survey Research Experimental Methods in Survey Research
2019년
Measuring Empathy in the 21st Century: Development of an Empathy Index Rooted in Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Justice (Report) Measuring Empathy in the 21st Century: Development of an Empathy Index Rooted in Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Justice (Report)
2011년
A Test of the Validity of the LCSW Examination: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?(Licensed Clinical Social Workers) (Report) A Test of the Validity of the LCSW Examination: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?(Licensed Clinical Social Workers) (Report)
2010년
What About Me? Siblings of Children with an Anxiety Disorder (Report) What About Me? Siblings of Children with an Anxiety Disorder (Report)
2006년
Child Custody Loss Among Women with Persistent Severe Mental Illness. Child Custody Loss Among Women with Persistent Severe Mental Illness.
2004년
The Effect of Corporal Punishment on Antisocial Behavior in Children. The Effect of Corporal Punishment on Antisocial Behavior in Children.
2004년
Keeping "Community" in a Community Land Trust (Case Study) Keeping "Community" in a Community Land Trust (Case Study)
2011년