United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Armold United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Armold

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Armold

218 Kan. 102, 542 P.2d 694, KS.0042216(1975)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The opinion of the court was delivered by The Director of Taxation for the Department of Revenue appeals from a judgment of the district court ordering the [218 Kan. 103] Department to refund the total amount of compensating use tax paid by United Parcel Service, Inc., on certain of its vehicles brought into the state. The sole issue for our determination is whether the district court erred in finding the vehicles in question were used for movement in interstate commerce within the meaning of K.S.A. 79-3704 (a). The taxing authority will be referred to as the Department, and the taxpayer as UPS.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1975
November 8
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
63.6
KB

More Books Like This

Rethinking the Role of the Dormant Commerce Clause in State Tax Jurisdiction. Rethinking the Role of the Dormant Commerce Clause in State Tax Jurisdiction.
2004
Rethinking Tax Nexus and Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And the Dormant Commerce Clause. Rethinking Tax Nexus and Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And the Dormant Commerce Clause.
2008

More Books by Supreme Court of Kansas

Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
State v. Smolin State v. Smolin
1976
Brown v. Wichita State University Brown v. Wichita State University
1975
Haz-Mat Response Haz-Mat Response
1996
Heiman v. Parrish Heiman v. Parrish
1997
Jones v. Kansas City Embalming & Casket Co. Jones v. Kansas City Embalming & Casket Co.
1962