United States V. Hoffa
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
These appeals are from an order of the District Court denying Appellants' third motion for a new trial. Like the second one, it was also based on alleged newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered evidence does not relate to the guilt or innocence of Appellants. The motion was not filed until nearly eighteen months after their conviction and one month after we had affirmed. United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965), aff'd 385 U.S. 293, 87 S. Ct. 408, 17 L. Ed. 2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied February 27, 1967, 386 U.S. 951, 87 S. Ct. 970, 17 L. Ed. 2d 880 (1967).*fn1
Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board
1983
Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc.
1992
Vestal v. Hoffa
1971
Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron
1987
Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co.
2003
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc.
1972