United States V. Hoffa United States V. Hoffa
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

These appeals are from an order of the District Court denying Appellants' third motion for a new trial. Like the second one, it was also based on alleged newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered evidence does not relate to the guilt or innocence of Appellants. The motion was not filed until nearly eighteen months after their conviction and one month after we had affirmed. United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965), aff'd 385 U.S. 293, 87 S. Ct. 408, 17 L. Ed. 2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied February 27, 1967, 386 U.S. 951, 87 S. Ct. 970, 17 L. Ed. 2d 880 (1967).*fn1

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1967
September 14
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
36
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
71.8
KB
Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board
1983
Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc. Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc.
1992
Vestal v. Hoffa Vestal v. Hoffa
1971
Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron
1987
Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co. Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co.
2003
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc. Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc.
1972