United States v. Wolfe
309 F.3d 932, 2002.C06.0000389
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2002 FED App. 0387P (6th Cir.) Argued: September 12, 2002 OPINION Defendant Donald Wolfe pleaded guilty to a series of Ohio bank robberies. On appeal, counsel raises the following issue related to the federal Sentencing Guidelines: Did the district court abuse its discretion when it departed upward by two levels because the multiple count adjustment, U.S.S.G. § 3D1.4, inadequately reflected the number of robberies committed by defendant? We conclude that it did not and therefore affirm the judgment. I.
Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik
2000
Foundation For Interior Design Education Research V. Savannah College Of Art & Design
2001
Medical Billing, Inc. v. Medical Management Sciences
2000
Dobbs-Weinstein V. Vanderbilt University
1999
United States V. Boucha
2001
Gulertekin V. Tinnelman-Cooper
2003