Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson turns to the most controversial aspect of the coronavirus epidemic - vaccinations - in the fourth installment of the best-selling Unreported Truths series.
When Pfizer and Moderna announced in November that their mRNA vaccines had cut coronavirus infections by 95 percent with few side effects, the world rejoiced. But in the months since, the truth has proven to be far more complex. Countries like Israel and Britain have seen sharp short-term spikes in coronavirus cases and deaths following the beginning of mass vaccination campaigns. Many people have reported severe side effects after being vaccinated.
Yet media outlets and public health authorities have largely ignored any potential risks as they encourage everyone, even young people at almost no risk from Covid, to be vaccinated. Berenson offers a more nuanced perspective, explaining both the risks and benefits of the new Covid vaccines - with a focus on the risks, since those have not been covered.
Like earlier Unreported Truths booklets, Part 4 draws on verifiable and checkable sources, including government documents, scientific papers, and news articles. It will give you a new perspective on the pros and cons of these new vaccines - and the truthful and accurate information you will not find anywhere else.
Please note: This ebook contains only the fourth section of Unreported Truths. The earlier sections are available separately.
So worth the read
This book is a must for hearing at least one voice that differs from the narrative we are all being force fed.
Based on only published facts and tries to connect the dots.
Should be mandatory reading prior to voicing an opinion.
A truth seeker
I really appreciate Berenson’s reporting in these Unreported Truth books and the included links. Reading both sides of an issue, investigating and integrating the facts into exisgting knowledge is an essential characteristic of science. I feel better equiped to access my own risk and what exactly confers safety. Just accepting the conclusions/mandates of others is second hand thinking at best and akin to faith at worst - yet these people see themselves as SCIENCE followers. All is exacerbaged when politcal gain is infused into an issue. We should all be looking to test our thinking against a steel man arguement - not a straw man formulation.
A data driven, unbiased read about COVID vaccines
Berenson does it again with an unbiased, fact based and data supported booklet that helps one understand the real pros and cons of COVID vaccines. He comes across as a King Solomon, willing to slice the baby in half in order to discover truth. This is the kind of reporting I wish was more prevalent these days...