Winship Winship

Winship

90 S. CT. 1068, 397 U.S. 358, 25 L. ED. 2D 368, 1970.SCT.41203

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

whether a juvenile is a delinquent as a result of alleged misconduct on his part, with the consequence that he may be committed to a state institution." In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 13 (1967). Gault decided that, although the Fourteenth Amendment does not require that the hearing at this stage conform with all the requirements of a criminal trial or even of the usual administrative proceeding, the Due Process Clause does require application during the adjudicatory hearing of "the essentials of due process and fair treatment." Id., at 30. This case presents the single, narrow question whether proof beyond a reasonable doubt is among the "essentials of due process and fair treatment" required during the adjudicatory stage when a juvenile is charged with an act which would constitute a crime if committed by an adult.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1970
March 31
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
38
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
68.1
KB
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Terry v. Ohio Terry v. Ohio
1968
Mapp v. Ohio Mapp v. Ohio
1961
Korematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States
1944