Worldcom Worldcom
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Section 251(b)(5) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-714 (the "1996 Act" or the "Act"), directs all local exchange carriers ("LECs") to "establish reciprocal compensation arrangements for the transport and termination of telecommunications." 47 U.S.C. § 251(b)(5). In the order before us the Federal Communications Commission held that under § 251(g) of the Act it was authorized to "carve out" from § 251(b)(5) calls made to internet service providers ("ISPs") located within the caller's local calling area. It relied entirely on § 251(g). Because that section is worded simply as a transitional device, preserving various LEC duties that antedated the 1996 Act until such time as the Commission should adopt new rules pursuant to the Act, we find the Commission's reliance on § 251(g) precluded. Thus we remand the case. Because there may well be other legal bases for adopting the rules chosen by the Commission for compensation between the originating and the terminating LECs in calls to ISPs, we neither vacate the order nor address petitioners' attacks on various interim provisions devised by the Commission.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
May 3
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
85.4
KB
Burke V. Gould Burke V. Gould
2002
Sloan v. Department of Housing & Urban Development Sloan v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
2000
Association of American Railroads v. Dept. of Transportation Association of American Railroads v. Dept. of Transportation
1999
Teamsters Local Union No. 61 v. United Parcel Service Teamsters Local Union No. 61 v. United Parcel Service
2001
United States Telecom Association V. Federal Communications Commission United States Telecom Association V. Federal Communications Commission
2002
Valencia-Lucena V. United States Coast Guard Valencia-Lucena V. United States Coast Guard
1999