![11/27/92 Conam Alaska V. Bell Lavalin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![11/27/92 Conam Alaska V. Bell Lavalin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
11/27/92 Conam Alaska V. Bell Lavalin
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
This case arises from a failed subcontractor relationship on a project on the North Slope. Conam Alaska appeals the superior court's dismissal of its professional negligence cause of action and the superior court's formulation of a jury instruction on piercing the corporate veil. Bell Lavalin cross-appeals, seeking to overturn the jury's verdict that Conam Alaska was excused from performing the contract and was entitled to damages.