A.F. v. State A.F. v. State

A.F. v. State

912 SO.2D 374, 30 FLA. L. WEEKLY D2370, 2005.FL.0005401

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

In this appeal from an order denying post conviction relief, we affirm the trial courts ruling that appellants trial counsel did not fail to function as counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, even though she did not move to suppress appellants statements on the grounds later identified in Roberts v. State, 874 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2005
7 de octubre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
5
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
53.1
KB

Más libros de In the District Court of Appeal of Florida Second District

Harris v. State Harris v. State
2005
Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co. Bridgeport, Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co.
2005
Snyder v. City Council of the City of Palmetto Snyder v. City Council of the City of Palmetto
2005
Smith v. State Smith v. State
2005
State v. Taylor State v. Taylor
2005
Burnett v. State Burnett v. State
2004