F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

F.O.P. Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

729 A.2D 1278, 1999.PA.43513 , 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2554

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The Fraternal Order of Police, Rose of Sharon Lodge No. 3 (FOP) petitions for review of the June 6, 1998 Final Order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) that dismissed a charge of unfair labor practice against the City of Sharon (City) after determining that the Citys unilateral reduction of a service requirement for promotion eligibility did not affect a mandatory subject of collective bargaining. The FOP contends that the Board erred by holding that a reduction in seniority requirements for a bargaining unit promotional opportunity in a Third Class City police department was not a mandatory subject of bargaining under the Act of June 24, 1968, P.L. 237, as amended, 43 P.S. 217.1—217.10, more commonly known as Act 111. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1999
18 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
9
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
77.4
KB

Más libros de Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Jones v. Commonwealth Jones v. Commonwealth
2002
Chittister v. State Civil Service Commission Chittister v. State Civil Service Commission
2002
School District of Philadelphia v. Independence Charter School School District of Philadelphia v. Independence Charter School
2001
School District of the City of York v. Lincoln-Edison Charter School School District of the City of York v. Lincoln-Edison Charter School
2001
Owens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board Owens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
2001
Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. v. Unemployement Compensation Board of Review Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. v. Unemployement Compensation Board of Review
2003