Fairbanks North Star Borough and Scott Fairbanks North Star Borough and Scott

Fairbanks North Star Borough and Scott

AK.202 , 747 P.2d 528 (1987)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

BURKE, Justice. In this appeal we are asked to determine which employer should be held liable for the payment of workers' compensation benefits
when employment with successive employers may have contributed to the worker's resulting disability. The Workers' Compensation
Board applied Alaska's last injurious exposure rule 1 to the case and determined that the worker's disability was causally
related to the worker's most recent employment. Accordingly, the Board held employer, Rogers and Babler, liable for payment
of the worker's disability benefits. On appeal, the superior court reversed and remanded on the grounds that the Board had
failed to make certain required findings and that the determination lacked substantial evidentiary support. 2 We now affirm
the Board's determination.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1987
18 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
16
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
69.8
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Alaska

Beers v. Jim Robison Beers v. Jim Robison
1985
Butler v. Dunlap Butler v. Dunlap
1997
State v. Arbuckle State v. Arbuckle
1997
Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska
1996
Voigt v. Snowden Voigt v. Snowden
1996
Ahwinona v. State Ahwinona v. State
1996