![Oko v. Rogers](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Oko v. Rogers](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Oko v. Rogers
125 Ill. App.3d 720, 466 N.E.2d 658, IL.0000883(1984)
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
This appeal arises out of a medical malpractice action brought by the plaintiff, June Oko, against the defendant, Dr. James Rogers, who appeared pro se. The complaint alleged that the defendant was negligent in performing hemorrhoid surgery on the plaintiff. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendant. The issues on appeal concern whether the plaintiff was denied her right to a fair trial due to the conduct of the defendant acting as his own counsel. An issue is also raised as to the jury instructions. Relevant facts will be presented as needed.