Partoll v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co‪.‬

1. Workmens compensation ? Injuries must be in course of employment. Unless claimant receives injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, there can be no recovery of compensation and whether the accident arises out of and in the course of employment depends upon particular facts and circumstances. 2. Administrative law and procedure ? Findings of Industrial Accident Board presumed correct. Where decisions of Industrial Accident Board and court involve consideration of conflicting evidence as to essential facts or deduction of permissible but diverse interferences therefrom, their solutions of such conflict are presumed to be correct, and the burden of proof is on the party attacking them to show that they were erroneous. 3. Workmens compensation ? Evidence insufficient to show compensable injury. Evidence was insufficient to show that the employer gave the employee a letter to mail for the employer in another city in which the employee lived, so that the injuries sustained by the employee in an automobile accident occurring while the employee was driving to the - Page 306 other city after completing his shift were not compensable as arising out of or in the course of employment.