Paule v. Santa Fe County Board of County Commissioners Paule v. Santa Fe County Board of County Commissioners

Paule v. Santa Fe County Board of County Commissioners

117 P.3D 240, 138 N.M. 82, 2005-NMSC-021, 2005.NM.0000095

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

1 Petitioners SkyHigh Communications, Estevan Gonzales, and the Santa Fe County Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter "Commission") appeal from a decision of the district court reversing a decision by the Commission approving SkyHighs application for master plan zoning and a height variance. The issue on appeal to this Court only involves the Commissions approval of the variance. Petitioners sought review of the district courts decision in the Court of Appeals by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. See NMSA 1978, 39-3-1.1(E) (1999) (permitting a party to petition the Court of Appeals for a writ of certiorari to review the district courts decision in an administrative appeal); Rule 12-505(B) NMRA 2005 (same). The Court of Appeals granted the petition, but after briefing by the parties, the court quashed the writ without any explanation. Petitioners then petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari, which we granted. See 39-3-1.1(E) ("A party may seek further review by filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the supreme court."); Rule 12-505(J) (stating that a party may seek further review from a decision of the Court of Appeals or a denial of certiorari by the Court of Appeals with Supreme Court by petitioning the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2005
26 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
34
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
93.7
KB

Más libros de In the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico

In re Yalkut In re Yalkut
2008
State v. Santiago State v. Santiago
2010
Cortez v. Cortez Cortez v. Cortez
2009
State v. Montoya State v. Montoya
2008
Doe v. Santa Clara Pueblo Doe v. Santa Clara Pueblo
2007
In re Treinen In re Treinen
2006