Paulin v. Midland Mutl. Life Ins. Co‪.‬

Per Curiam. To support its reliance upon the recurrent disabilities provision of the policy, the court of appeals found it necessary, in effect, to make two additional findings of fact: (1) That appellee suffered periods of total disability prior to June 16, 1969; and (2) that such prior periods of disability occurred at least through December 16, 1968. Neither of those findings contradicts the pertinent finding of the trial court that: