Uebelhack Equipment v. Garrett Brothers Uebelhack Equipment v. Garrett Brothers

Uebelhack Equipment v. Garrett Brothers

1980.IN.30487 408 N.E.2D 136; 77 IND. DEC. 313

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Plaintiff-appellants Dorothy and John Hirschauer are appealing a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendant-appellee C & E Shoejobbers, Inc. (C & E) with respect to their damage complaint for injuries suffered by Mrs. Hirschauer when she slipped and fell on a slick public sidewalk in Shelbyville, Indiana, in front of property which C & E, as original lessees, had subleased to a third party. On appeal, the Hirschauers contend C & E had a duty to remove ice or snow and that summary judgment was therefore improper, and that summary judgment was also improper because there was a material issue of fact as to whether C & E or its unspecified agents negligently attempted to remove ice and snow or had "control" of the sidewalk so as to be responsible for its condition. Because C & E had no duty to remove ice and snow and the Hirschauers have in essence improperly rested on the mere allegations of their complaint with respect to their other possible theories of liability, the trial courts grant of summary judgment in favor of C & E is affirmed.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1980
23 de julio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
10
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66
KB

Más libros de First District Court of Appeals of Indiana

Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider
1995
Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna
1995
James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness
1987
Parke County v. Ropak Parke County v. Ropak
1988
F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter
1988
Honda Motor Company v. Maxine Parks Honda Motor Company v. Maxine Parks
1985