Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc. Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc.

Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc‪.‬

1984.C09.40339 739 F.2D 434

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Thomas Menhorn appeals from a judgment upholding Firestone Tire & Rubber Companys denial of Menhorns application for benefits under Firestones employee retirement plan. Menhorn was employed by Firestone at its Akron, Ohio, plant from October 26, 1953, until he resigned on August 11, 1967, to move to California. Although Menhorn alleged otherwise in his complaint, uncontradicted declarations filed in support of Firestones motions below establish that Menhorn was informed before his resignation that he would not receive credit for his years of service in Akron should Firestone reemploy him in California. Menhorn was in fact rehired at Firestones Los Angeles plant on August 16, 1967, where he worked until he was laid off on June 13, 1980.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1984
31 de julio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
5
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
54
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
In re Marshall In re Marshall
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005
Dees v. Billy Dees v. Billy
2005