Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Relasco Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Relasco

Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Relasco

855 So.2d 668, 2003.FL.0004052, L. Weekly D2109(28 Fla)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

We affirm the order granting the former husband/appellee's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Since the former wife/appellant was seeking to enforce an oral agreement made subsequent to the dissolution of the marriage, the family division trial judge properly found lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Poling v. Tresidder, 373 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Where parties arrive at a subsequent agreement that was not a part of the trial court's final dissolution order, enforcement of that agreement cannot be obtained simply by filing a motion, but rather must be sought in a separate breach of contract action. See Paulucci v. General Dyn., 842 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 2003); MCR Funding v. CMG Funding Corp., 771 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
10 de septiembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
4
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
65.4
KB

Más libros de A.D. 2003 In the District Court of Appeal of Florida Third District July Term

Rewards Hotel Management Company, Llc v. Elite General Contractors Rewards Hotel Management Company, Llc v. Elite General Contractors
2003
White v. State White v. State
2003
D.B. v. State D.B. v. State
2003
Patz v. Department of Health Patz v. Department of Health
2003
Coicou v. State Coicou v. State
2003
E & a Produce Corp. v. Superior Garlic Intl E & a Produce Corp. v. Superior Garlic Intl
2003