White v. State White v. State

White v. State

855 SO.2D 723, 2003.FL.0004390 , 28 FLA. L. WEEKLY D2310

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

On January 13, 2002, Defendant filed a Rule 3.850 motion in the court below claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. Approximately a month later, Defendant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court claiming ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Believing that it was without jurisdiction to entertain the Rule 3.850 motion while the habeas corpus petition was pending, the trial court dismissed the Rule 3.850 motion for lack of jurisdiction. As the State correctly concedes, the motion should not have been dismissed because the two claims are separate and distinct and thus may proceed simultaneously:

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
8 de octubre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
54.9
KB

Más libros de A.D. 2003 In the District Court of Appeal of Florida Third District July Term

Rewards Hotel Management Company, Llc v. Elite General Contractors Rewards Hotel Management Company, Llc v. Elite General Contractors
2003
Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Relasco Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Relasco
2003
D.B. v. State D.B. v. State
2003
Patz v. Department of Health Patz v. Department of Health
2003
Coicou v. State Coicou v. State
2003
E & a Produce Corp. v. Superior Garlic Intl E & a Produce Corp. v. Superior Garlic Intl
2003