Paul Schoonover Inc. V. Ram Construction Inc. Paul Schoonover Inc. V. Ram Construction Inc.

Paul Schoonover Inc. V. Ram Construction Inc‪.‬

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

It has long been established in Arizona that an appellate court must view the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the judgment was rendered and if there is any evidence to support the judgment of the trial court, it must be affirmed. Kubby v. Crescent Steel, 105 Ariz. 459, 466 P.2d 753 (1970); Hueg v. Sunburst Farms (Glendale) Mutual Water & Agricultural Co., 122 Ariz. 284, 594 P.2d 538 (App.1979). Viewed in this light, we affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1981
2 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
64
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

Byrne v. Nezhat Byrne v. Nezhat
2001
State v. Spillman State v. Spillman
1970
Young Candy & Tobacco Co. V. Montoya Young Candy & Tobacco Co. V. Montoya
1962
Swanson v. Image Bank Swanson v. Image Bank
2003
Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole Allstate Insurance Co. v. O''toole
1995
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp. Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
1995