Rand Unit Examines Pay-out Differences of No-Fault, Third-Party Auto Systems; Pip Gets Passing Grade (Looking Back ... Insurance Advocate, 25 Years Ago)
Insurance Advocate 2010, May 10, 121, 9
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
SANTA MONICA, Calif. -- Roughly two-thirds of all civil litigation in the U.S. involves automobile accidents. The only brush most Americans are likely to have with the civil justice system would be because of that same auto mishap. Every year hundreds of thousands of people seek redress for injuries suffered in such accidents and vast amounts of money are awarded to them in compensation. The effectiveness and equity of this system is open to much debate.
More Books Like This
Maximum Recovery - Insurance Claims Demystified
2010
Litigation Patterns in Automobile Bodily Injury Claims 1977-1997: Effects of Time and Tort Reforms.
2008
Personal Bias in Automobile Claims Settlement (Statistical Data Included)
2003
Precaution Incentives in Accident Settings
2009
Injured Money
2014
Is No-Fault Insurance a Viable Alternative to Our Professional Liability Insurance System?
2010
More Books by Insurance Advocate
From the Gen X'ers and Millenials: Are You "Boomers" Listening? Read That Again. Are You Really Listening? (Face to Face)
2009
Fiduciary Funds: Agents and Brokers Face Potential New Exposures Amid Uncertainties in Financial Markets
2008
Impounded Car: Owner Not Liable for Storage Fees (Courtside)
2009
Vigorous Rehabilitation Program Urged for N.Y. Workers Compensation System (Looking Back ... Insurance Advocate, 25 Years Ago)
2011
Bad Faith Claim Against Insurer Dismissed on Summary Judgment; Doubts As to Extent of Injury Existed: Doherty V Merchants Mut. Ins. Co. (Courtside)
2010
Top 5 Winning Strategies for Insurance Marketers (Marketing) (Company Overview)
2010