Brown V. Anderson Brown V. Anderson
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

In these consolidated proceedings, *fn1 John Waymon Brown, Russell Vance Buras, Larry Robert Hammond, and Michael Kirk Ross (appellants) complain of the trial court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings which invoked the Texas Arbitration Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 171.001-171.098 (Vernon Supp. 2003). A trial court's order denying arbitration is subject to interlocutory appeal if the motion to compel arbitration sufficiently invokes the Texas Arbitration Act. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.098(a) (Vernon Supp. 2003). Because we find the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellants' motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings, we reverse and remand the cause to the trial court.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
March 6
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
13
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
59.2
KB
Gaspard v. Dupont Dow Elastomers Gaspard v. Dupont Dow Elastomers
2004
Franks v. Woodville Independent School District Franks v. Woodville Independent School District
2004
In re K.C In re K.C
2000
Thomas v. White Thomas v. White
2003
Cash v. Beaumont Dealers Auto Auction Cash v. Beaumont Dealers Auto Auction
2009
Klein & Associates Political Relations v. Port Arthur Independent School District Klein & Associates Political Relations v. Port Arthur Independent School District
2002
Mannick v. Wakeland Mannick v. Wakeland
2004
In re Valero Energy Corp. In re Valero Energy Corp.
1998
A. Ybarra v. Carlos Saldana A. Ybarra v. Carlos Saldana
1981
State v. Huff State v. Huff
1998
State v. Granville State v. Granville
2006
Morales v. Reynolds Morales v. Reynolds
2004