Morales v. Reynolds Morales v. Reynolds

Morales v. Reynolds

97 P.3D 612, 136 N.M. 280, 2004-NMCA-098, 2004.NM.0000096

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

1 The two cases on appeal here present an opportunity to examine the standard announced in Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc., 2001-NMSC-034, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148, which expanded the set of circumstances under which a worker may pursue an independent tort action outside of the exclusivity provision of the Workers Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, § 52-1-9 (1973). We hold that neither of these cases meets the requirements of the test set forth in Delgado, 2001-NMSC-034, 26. We consolidate the cases and affirm both district court decisions in favor of Defendants.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
June 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
65.1
KB
Gilliland v. Hanging Tree Inc. Gilliland v. Hanging Tree Inc.
1978
Oklahoma Park v. Oklahoma Horse Racing Oklahoma Park v. Oklahoma Horse Racing
1986
Stewart v. Judge of 15Th Judicial District Stewart v. Judge of 15Th Judicial District
1975
Hill v. Culligan Soft Water Service Company Hill v. Culligan Soft Water Service Company
1965
Hillcrest Medical Center v. Wier Hillcrest Medical Center v. Wier
1962
Hurst v. Empie Hurst v. Empie
1993
Mannick v. Wakeland Mannick v. Wakeland
2004
Brown V. Anderson Brown V. Anderson
2003
Weiss v. Weiss Weiss v. Weiss
1969
State V. Heirs Of Kapahi State V. Heirs Of Kapahi
1964
Fleming v. Mcferson Fleming v. Mcferson
1933
Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1936