People v. Doherty People v. Doherty

People v. Doherty

908 P.2d 1120, 1996.CO.41136

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Original Proceeding in Discipline EN BANC Per Curiam In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case admitted that he neglected and then misrepresented the status of a client's dissolution of marriage proceeding. The conditional admission recommended the imposition of either a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel's recommendation. I.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
January 8
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
49.2
KB
Cruz v. Homebase Cruz v. Homebase
2000
Mcminn v. Harrison Mcminn v. Harrison
1933
Knauss v. Seventh-Day Adventist Association Knauss v. Seventh-Day Adventist Association
1948
Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich Mile High Fence Co. v. Radovich
1971
Schwalb v. Connely Schwalb v. Connely
1947
Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co. Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
2009