People V. Lopez People V. Lopez

People V. Lopez

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The crime of carjacking requires the "felonious taking" of a motor vehicle. (Pen. Code, § 215.) *fn1 Similarly, the crime of robbery requires the "felonious taking" of personal property. (§ 211.) California courts, following common law, have long held that the "taking" element of robbery requires that a defendant gain possession of the victim's property and asport or carry it away. (See People v. Cooper (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1158, 1165 (Cooper); Perkins & Boyce, Criminal Law (3d ed. 1982) § 2, pp. 343-344 (Perkins).) Does the felonious taking element of the crime of carjacking, like robbery, require asportation or movement of the motor vehicle? We conclude that it does. Because the Court of Appeal came to a contrary decision, we reverse that court's judgment.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
November 24
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
65.5
KB

More Books by California Supreme Court

People v. Yeoman People v. Yeoman
2003
Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of Hartford Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of Hartford
2003
In re Barnett In re Barnett
2003
Jimenez v. Superior Coourt of San Diego County Jimenez v. Superior Coourt of San Diego County
2002
In re Estate of Joseph In re Estate of Joseph
1998
In re Stephanie M. In re Stephanie M.
1994