Serving Two Masters? State Implementation of Federal Regulatory Policy (Report) Serving Two Masters? State Implementation of Federal Regulatory Policy (Report)

Serving Two Masters? State Implementation of Federal Regulatory Policy (Report‪)‬

Public Administration Quarterly 2008, Winter, 32, 4

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

During the 1960s and 1970s there was a tremendous spurt in enabling legislation for vast new networks of social regulation. This form of regulation, which Ripley and Franklin (1986) term "protective regulatory," is designed to protect citizens from the harmful effects of unrestrained competition; examples include consumer product safety protection, workplace safety protection, and environmental protection. Many of these policies have been implemented by state governments, utilizing a mechanism called partial preemption. This device enables the federal government to return program responsibility to the states while retaining the ultimate authority to decide on the adequacy of state actions. States are allowed to design and implement their own laws, so long as these laws are consistent with national goals and meet federal guidelines. If a state elects not to participate or is unable to secure national approval for its programs, the overseeing federal agency assumes responsibility for enforcing federal statutes within that state's boundaries. Once a state obtains approval for its programs, program implementation is employed through national and state authority concurrently, though the state is given primary administrative responsibility, or "primacy", within its borders. This implementation largely delegates the authority for developing and enforcing regulatory standards to state agencies. The relevant federal agency is empowered to revoke its grant of primacy at any time at which it determines that the state is no longer in compliance with federal mandates. States are likewise free to rescind their assumption of program authority at any time. This intermixing of national and state enforcement responsibility comprises what one scholar refers to as "conjoint federalism" (Welborn 1988). Examples of conjoint federalism include federal health and safety regulation (as implemented through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration), surface mining regulation (under the auspices of the Office of Surface Mining) and many recent pieces of environmental regulation, which are implemented through the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2008
December 22
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
25
Pages
PUBLISHER
Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, Inc.
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
290.3
KB
The Dimensions of Federalism The Dimensions of Federalism
2012
Meeting the Challenge of 9/11: Blueprints for More Effective Government Meeting the Challenge of 9/11: Blueprints for More Effective Government
2014
Clean Water Policy and State Choice Clean Water Policy and State Choice
2022
Encyclopedia of Policy Studies, Second Edition Encyclopedia of Policy Studies, Second Edition
2020
Public Regulation of Site Selection for Nuclear Power Plants Public Regulation of Site Selection for Nuclear Power Plants
2016
When Governments Lobby Governments When Governments Lobby Governments
2022
Implementing Organizational Reform Strategies in State Governments (Report) Implementing Organizational Reform Strategies in State Governments (Report)
2009
No "One Best Way" to Manage Change: Developing and Describing Distinct Administrative Reform Dimensions Across the Fifty American States (Report) No "One Best Way" to Manage Change: Developing and Describing Distinct Administrative Reform Dimensions Across the Fifty American States (Report)
2009
Organizational Assessment Tools: Report Cards and Scorecards of the Federal Agencies (Report) Organizational Assessment Tools: Report Cards and Scorecards of the Federal Agencies (Report)
2010
Evaluating Contracting-out Performance in Taiwan: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Private Contractors (Report) Evaluating Contracting-out Performance in Taiwan: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Private Contractors (Report)
2010
Paradox of Public Sector Reforms in Malaysia: A Good Governance Perspective. Paradox of Public Sector Reforms in Malaysia: A Good Governance Perspective.
2007
The New Architecture of State Government Administration: Key Questions and Preliminary Answers (Report) The New Architecture of State Government Administration: Key Questions and Preliminary Answers (Report)
2009