The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution in 20 Questions

I would say that the basic argument of the book resorts to an old, repeated logical fallacy: false dichotomy. It is an either/or fallacy where by trying to discredit one viewpoint or theory in this case, instantly lends support to the supposed only other theoretical alternative. So by trying to use fallacious evolutionary arguments, the author thinks this then automatically bolsters his creationist viewpoint. I noticed that all creationist diatribes against evolution (or is it natural selection), when failing to butcher or misconstrue the available evidence supporting evolution, resort to almost every type of logical fallacy known. Here's a quick list I gathered from reading just the sample:
Excluded middle - false dichotomy
Straw man argument
Ad homenim
Baseless assertions
Slippery slope
Non sequitur
Burden of proof
Argument From Adverse Consequences (Appeal To Fear, Scare Tactics)
Argument from age
Argument by emotive language
Stolen concept
Argument from authority
Argument as an authority
Appeal to anonymous authority
Causal reductionism
Complex question
Argument by pigheadedness
Argument by half truth
Argument by selective reading
Argument by generalization
Error of fact
Argument from personal astonishment
Pious fraud
Outdated information
Moving the goalposts
Appeal to complexity
Appeal to common sense
Quote mining and quotes out of context

Can't even buy the book because the sample is just awful! Entire thesis of the first chapter are just lies, nothing but lies, and also A HUGE AMOUNT of vague statements. Deluded writer.

What a great author who understands his topic and refute long-believed concepts adopted by the West.