Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside) Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)

Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside‪)‬

Insurance Advocate 2010, Sept 17

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

Was the defendant bus driver faced with an emergency situation when the garbage truck that he had been following began to suddenly back up after being stopped? This court holds that the defendant was not faced with an emergency situation and the action of backing up into the plaintiff's stopped vehicle was negligent as a matter of law. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. This action arises out of a motor vehicle accident. It is undisputed that both plaintiff and defendant were fully stopped prior to the defendant backing up and hitting plaintiff's car. Defendant alleges that he had been following a garbage truck when the garbage truck stopped to load garbage. Allegedly, the garbage truck suddenly began to reverse which forced the defendant to back up. Defendant did not see the plaintiff's vehicle prior to the collision. Defendant's vehicle was not hit by the garbage truck. Plaintiff testified that she was not aware of the alleged garbage truck in front of defendant's vehicle as her visibility was blocked due to the size of defendant's bus.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2010
17 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
CINN Group, Inc.
PROVIDER INFO
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
70.6
KB
From Booker to Gall: The Evolution of the Reasonableness Doctrine As Applied to White-Collar Criminals and Sentencing Variances (Part 1) From Booker to Gall: The Evolution of the Reasonableness Doctrine As Applied to White-Collar Criminals and Sentencing Variances (Part 1)
2008
HIF Bio, Inc. And Bizbiotech Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co., Ltd. (Doing Business As Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals and Yung Shin Pharm. Ind. Co. Ltd.), Yung Zip Chemical Co., Ltd., Fang-Yu Lee, And Che-Ming Teng, Defendants, And Carlsbad Technology, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, And Fish and Richardson P.C., and Y. Rocky Tsao, Defendants (Case Overview) HIF Bio, Inc. And Bizbiotech Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co., Ltd. (Doing Business As Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals and Yung Shin Pharm. Ind. Co. Ltd.), Yung Zip Chemical Co., Ltd., Fang-Yu Lee, And Che-Ming Teng, Defendants, And Carlsbad Technology, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, And Fish and Richardson P.C., and Y. Rocky Tsao, Defendants (Case Overview)
2010
Peer Review Immunity? Think Again: Recent Developments in Federal and State Law (Health Law Update) Peer Review Immunity? Think Again: Recent Developments in Federal and State Law (Health Law Update)
2007
Confidential Witnesses in Securities Litigation. Confidential Witnesses in Securities Litigation.
2011
Playing with Post-Booker Fire: The Dangers of Increased Judicial Discretion in Federal White Collar Sentencing. Playing with Post-Booker Fire: The Dangers of Increased Judicial Discretion in Federal White Collar Sentencing.
2007
Worker Breaking up Roadway has No Case for Slipping on Debris She Created: Mosca V Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth (Courtside) Worker Breaking up Roadway has No Case for Slipping on Debris She Created: Mosca V Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth (Courtside)
2009
Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside) Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)
2010
Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside) Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)
2010
Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath) Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)
2010
Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside) Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)
2010
Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside) Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)
2010
Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside) Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)
2010