Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)

Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside)

Once Again, Insurer is Criticized for Claims Practices: It "Borders on Impropriety" to Selectively Cite Old, Obsolete Arb Decisions (Courtside‪)‬

Insurance Advocate 2010, Feb 8, 121, 3

Lawrence N. Rogak

- 2,99 €

- 2,99 €

In the Matter of the Arbitration between Immediate Imaging PC and Global Liberty Insurance Company, AAA Case No. 412009041330, AAA Assessment No. 17 991 21272 09 (Insurer's Claim File No. 083889) (Aaron D. Maslow, Esq., arbitrator) The Applicant commenced this No-Fault arbitration, seeking as compensation $912.00, which it billed for performing a lumbar spine MRI on July 16, 2008, on Assignor, a 42-year old male, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on Feb. 3, 2008. Respondent Insurer denied payment, invoking the 30-day rule for providing written notice of claim.

GENRE

Business & Personal Finance

RELEASED

2010

8 February

LANGUAGE

EN

English

LENGTH

7

Pages

PUBLISHER

CINN Group, Inc.

PROVIDER INFO

The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.

SIZE

65.9

KB

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Insured May Not Refuse to Answer EUO Questions on Basis of "Spousal Privilege" (Courtside)

Insured May Not Refuse to Answer EUO Questions on Basis of "Spousal Privilege" (Courtside)

Insured May Not Refuse to Answer EUO Questions on Basis of "Spousal Privilege" (Courtside)

Something You'll Want to Tell Your Insureds; One New Development; And Two Points I've Overlooked: Plaintiff Sues Your Insured by Serving the NY Secretary of State; Ambiguity and Extrinsic Evidence; Groundless, False Or Fraudulent Liability Claims; Motor Truck Cargo Insurance Revision (Exposures and Coverages)

Something You'll Want to Tell Your Insureds; One New Development; And Two Points I've Overlooked: Plaintiff Sues Your Insured by Serving the NY Secretary of State; Ambiguity and Extrinsic Evidence; Groundless, False Or Fraudulent Liability Claims; Motor Truck Cargo Insurance Revision (Exposures and Coverages)

Something You'll Want to Tell Your Insureds; One New Development; And Two Points I've Overlooked: Plaintiff Sues Your Insured by Serving the NY Secretary of State; Ambiguity and Extrinsic Evidence; Groundless, False Or Fraudulent Liability Claims; Motor Truck Cargo Insurance Revision (Exposures and Coverages)

B.I. Claimant has No Claim Against Insurer for Failing to Notify Her of Right to Buy Spousal Coverage: Shofler V Geico Ins. Co (Courtside)

B.I. Claimant has No Claim Against Insurer for Failing to Notify Her of Right to Buy Spousal Coverage: Shofler V Geico Ins. Co (Courtside)

B.I. Claimant has No Claim Against Insurer for Failing to Notify Her of Right to Buy Spousal Coverage: Shofler V Geico Ins. Co (Courtside)

The Law of Tax-Exempt Healthcare Organizations, + website

The Law of Tax-Exempt Healthcare Organizations, + website

The Law of Tax-Exempt Healthcare Organizations, + website

Adrift in a Sea of Uncertainty: Tax Accrual Workpapers are Work-Product ... But Showing Them to Your Auditor May Waive the Protection

Adrift in a Sea of Uncertainty: Tax Accrual Workpapers are Work-Product ... But Showing Them to Your Auditor May Waive the Protection

Adrift in a Sea of Uncertainty: Tax Accrual Workpapers are Work-Product ... But Showing Them to Your Auditor May Waive the Protection

Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)

Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)

Use of Race-Modified Car Comes Under Exclusion--Even Though.... Peter Stephan V Clarendon Natl. Ins (Courtside)

Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)

Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)

Internet Postings Alone Do Not Constitute "Doing Business" in New York for out of State Resident: Gary Null & Assoc., Inc. V Phillips (Courtside)

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Despite Insurer's Lack of Founded Belief in Fraudulent Incorporation, EUO No-Show Results in Suit Dismissal: Andrew Gegerson DPM Et Al. A/a/O Dana Frazier V State Farm Ins. Co (Examination Under Oath)

Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)

Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)

Trusting Plaintiff's Attorney to Vacate a Default Proves to Be a Costly Mistake: Sz Med., P.C. Et Al. A/a/O Clarice Cowan V Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co (Courtside)

Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)

Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)

Pre-Claim Ime No Show Supports Denial, Even if for a Different Specialty Than Bill; Only One Pre-and Post-Claim No Shows Required for Denial: Prime Psychological Servs., Pc a/a/O Brent Horne V Elrac, Inc. (Courtside)

Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)

Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)

Bus Backing up to Avoid Truck in Front That Was Backing up, Is Not an Emergency; Bus Liable to Car It Backed Into! Rodriguez V Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc. (Courtside)