G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

1989.TX.40591; 775 S.W.2D 626, 32 TEX. SUP. J. 332

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

This case presents the question of whether the determination of causation in an appellate legal malpractice case is a question of law or a question of fact. This is an issue of first impression in Texas. G. Stefane Millhouse II brought suit against his former attorney, Ronald G. Wiesenthal, for damages caused by Wiesenthals failure to timely file a statement of facts with the court of appeals in an earlier case in which Wiesenthal had represented Millhouse. The trial court granted Wiesenthals motion for summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law that Wiesenthals failure to file the statement of facts in the earlier case was not the cause of Millhouses loss of that case on appeal. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 757 S.W.2d 103. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
19 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
66.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of Utah

State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy State Utah v. Theodore Robert Bundy
1978
Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company Byron K. Varme v. Leonard Gordon and Gfta Trendanalysen B.G.A. Herrdum Gmbh & Company
1994
State v. Fedder Et Al. State v. Fedder Et Al.
1953
Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton
1989
Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission Benny Fatt v. Utah State Tax Commission
1994
Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954