Comments on the White, Caufield, And Tarr Articles (Response to Articles in This Issue, P. 573, 605, 635) (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
Missouri Law Review 2009, Summer, 74, 3
-
- 2,99 €
-
- 2,99 €
Descripción editorial
These three articles are valuable additions to the literature on retention elections. I am honored to comment, understanding I was chosen because I have survived merit selection (both as an applicant and as chair of the commission), a retention election, federal appointment, various roles in partisan elections, and an undergraduate political-science, voter-behavior education. I. JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
Protecting the Predator Or the Prey? the Missouri Supreme Court's Refusal to Allow Past Sexual Misconduct As Propensity Evidence.
2009
Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education.
2009
The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan: The Least Political Method of Selecting High Quality Judges (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
The Foreclosure Purchase by the Equity of Redemption Holder Or Other Junior Interests: When Should Principles of Fairness and Morality Trump Normal Priority Rules?(Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman)
2007
The Missouri Plan in National Perspective (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009