State v. Bachman
157 WASH.APP. 1055, 2010.WA.0001195
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Description de l’éditeur
Damen Bachman was not appointed counsel for a resentencing hearing at which the court amended his judgment and sentence as directed by the Supreme Court. Because the court merely corrected ministerial errors and exercised no discretion, the hearing was not a critical stage in Bachmans prosecution. We therefore reject Bachmans claim that he was denied his constitutional right to counsel.