Explaining

Fiction with macula degeneration, seemingly.  There was an author. That was all.  The holes in the eye weapt unto the sight of light and dark.  Normally, it would be about night and day, or rather light or dark instead a holy / unholy look at numbers, names and named numbers.  There was more.  84 pages of this and that.  The passion is there, yet akin to a blunder.  When the author has explaining; the author might have submitted an omnipotent view of something greater and in paper.  It was not a couplet, nor duo.  One decimal and an author.  One system and heating oil; it sold itself.

A Small Critique of Humanity and Archaeopteryx
The critique is in the ability. Humanity and pristine land meld in the ability. The critique is in the ability. What was the meld? A common compare / contrast manuscript is based on likes, dislikes, neutralities and similarities. Rather, humanity would have existed; with / without Archaeopteryx.

Throughout the dawns of age; humanity has been scrutinized by those that thought that their situation was not fair, etc. The most influential way to captivate a situation is / was to capitalize. The only determinant of life was a that a breed greater than self could perpetuate. It was a declarative statement and a statement that allowed for situations to be ratified and cordial. Throughout the dawns of age; humanity has been scrutinized by those that thought their situation was not fair, etc. What did this mean for today? Or, rather yesterday. It was jaundiced and ridicule. Rather, rather, or rather…

The elemental bow or glide was fundamental to science. It affirms that the hard work is / was in scrutiny. There was more. There was a lot more. The individual reason that life and the situational experiences of life made direct cooperation with humanity was the scrutiny. Scrutiny and self development are hand and hand. The simplistic view of life and life, more still can become one with scrutiny. It not only festers it glides elements and and societies and malformed situations. There was auto dilate and auto pilot. Both one in the same because all to often the auditory jibber-jabber is heresy. Thus / this end result is more for the “ spoken ” than the speaker. Truth denies error. Truth denies desire. Truth is defining unto humanity. The effortless motions of making societal gestures into humanity shaped idioms; the retrospective decision would / was to compare and contrast dead and something that is post-death. There was a typical dismemberment of thought and that gave way to hearsay. There was simplistic views and more over a causal sense of view. To see is a truth. To see is privilege. To deny sight is a crime. The echoing worlds that defined humanity and a dead or outdated organism are not parallel. They are perhaps, one in the same and filled with rapture. It was an abhorrent shifter that made rapture. It was the rapture of the special sort. There is time and time known. There is time and time known. Time is a form of truth. Truth waits for nothing, not even time. It was a codified conundrum. There was family. There was hearsay. There was this, there was that. There was a demonic plague of words that characterized how people felt about being scrutinized. Some lifted their heads high. Some were oblivious to the principle that joy and joyeux were not humanitarian translations. Rather the bonafide use of time as a truth was in the rapture. It was less the pre cursor of en- and more rapture. That was satisfying. The satisfying / satisfied compare compare and contrast was of color.

Color was not rare. The technology was there to produce and produce all the loving nutrients one could consume. Humanity facd another conundrum; to deny and exonerate all audio-thought. That was the real splice in the slice. The malevolent use of low oscillations and high and low pass filters was all and great. There was more. How would humanity embrace for a technological approach to audio-thought. This is a compar / contrast of humanity and a dead breed of evolutionary importance. The indecision was that the resemblance was the desire and truth was that desire was now innocence. Insuring innocence irrorovaobly initiated integers and internal thought The audio-thought was the cognitive premonition that demolition was made ritual. Regardless, the jaundiced lives affected by heresy were real. The audio- thought was too low frequency and was too, too depth - defying. To some the humanitarian effort to a new humanitarian frontier existed / exists. Color was not rare. The peoples’ need was on mind with audio-thought. It was scientific blunder how humanity divided a dead breed among something more in tune, or formidable. There was discord and this discord was deeply rooted in the key that made the door open. It was a necessary means for a necessary means. The archaeopteryx sputtered and hovered. It was not the first of its kind, however it was the first in line. It was the next in line. The audio-thought and its impact on humanity was yet to be seen. There was resemblance and balance and a forthright effort to understand. The keys simply slipped through the door; the door simply opened the minds of the general population. There was elation, elution and evolution. It, it and it…. The available elution took time and the evolution brought elation. The only thing that made life now, with elation was simple acoustics. The audio-thought. It had / has been said that the audio—thought is / was paramount to establishing a greater humanity. The only resemblance was that the gilded and guilted were in geriatric mode. AKA…the past. Living in the future was probable and of course reasonable. Pssst…the past. Living in the future was probable and of course reasonable.
This is evolution and progression into humanity. The humane refers to a benevolent nature.
When reality and an ever progressed / progression state of humanity is occurring the general public have little knowledge. That is where the best lessons retain unto. Humanity is a verb..it is and can parenthetically be used to see a progression. People are included. Humane benevolence is always required. There was a patient. Rather, all are / were told to silence. The audio-thought and the best rationale an ear can seethe would be scratching. It was gone. Morally, it was like the archaeopteryx had spread unto a vast village of lined lineage. There was patience and pestilence. That was old. The evolution of commentary was the lineage of the humane benevolence. It was commentary that allowed for humane to be the carrier of evolution.
The relics of an older type bird-reptile were futile and extinct. There was repetition and allocation of defeat. The flock, per se, is / was getting smaller. It went like this. Flying in the trees and manifesting all bird like traits; it was a first. There was not a portion that was different, only the terrain that hovered them around. Archaeopteryx was them and the informal criticism about a bird is that they relate to futile EARTH shattering events. The so-so approach is / was blatant and made ever supreme how causality makes eradication. The resistance and the self fulfilling humanitarian would tell you, “ they’re extinct ”. In reality, one had to understand flock and EARTH shattering events. In fact, the humane humanitarian believed in humanity: good, bad or in-different. The pure pressure to make humanity palatable was future driven. It was a nice save and predicament that made the prophetic, acknowledgeable.
The essence of a bird, perhaps the first of its kind was doomed. Would or did humanity remember Archaeopteryx? It was to be seen. It is true; Archaeopteryx is a different kind of species; DOMAIN KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES. Humanity breaches and makes all into a filed domain. There was pressure to correctly diagnose the domain. Hence, confusion. Archaeopteryx or Humanity, rather small critical approach to something different. There was a focus about humanity. It wanted to be translated and made reticent; at the foot, or persons worldly or non-worldly. Drop. Color and majestic beauty gave the black and white “ color me it ” poster harmony. It was draw time and time to make a drawing of where a bird-reptile foreigner could replace the conceptualization of humanity. However, this was a farce. Humanity was real and that was the end. Or, was it? The establishment knew that tidings coming in the form of strange “ phylums ” or “ orders ” or “ class ”. Humanity reeled,
“ What is the difference between a t test and a p test? It was relative and t was not time. Archaeopteryx ran out of time; or morphed, molted or melted. The whopping time span was incoherent and not fair. It was in the holder of the human decision. Where all human decisions; humane decisions? That was the typical and that was the way it was going to layer itself. Humanity reeled, “ what was the difference between a bottleneck and a jackknife-d population? These were valid questions and the one reptile-bird that would / did answer is not gone. So much for plumage and webbed feet…if that’s what the farce was all about. There was not a romantic place for humanity to rest in this small critique. The idea that humanity was in the helms of persona and “ pro bono ” work…the regard was in the goodbye. To reiterate; if humanity in its finest or darkest hour was to rejuvenate; free would be out and not “ mimic persona ”. Humanity relied, “ persona and reptile non grata ”. Was that spelled right? Perhaps, in this instance and this instance alone…alone…into the wilderness with a lot of strange animals and bird-reptiles…

On a lighter note: humanity in some instances says the world was created in a shorter amount of time. ( In the most blatant first person of all time; I actually think there is truth to everything.) Back to rhetoric and balance and things that people like to become “ humane ” about: humanity is a small commentary about itself…that makes sense in one context. That context is contact and re-contact among massive amount of personas. Bump. Bump. Bump, please. The blind-sided Archaeopteryx was clipped by its neighbor. The neighbor made a big deal out of nothing; nothing that a newly molten bird-reptile, special “ domain ”. The original, violated Archaeopteryx snipped and began to hold a grudge. It was humanity for a different race than do-do’s. Back to the moving and grooving / gliding reptiles. The snippy one regarded and regarded; it was time to take HUMANITY back to its snippy roots. Humanity was all about humanistic characteristics that made the world bump and glide. Humane, yeah. That was the one word that foiled humanity. To be, to be. To be great; not once but all the time for a future legacy. It was motivational to know that without the abstract…nothing. Without the question; humanity is quite nothing. Hypothesis laid and materials on deck…methods made data procure; harder, longer and faster. The analysis of humanity was said. Things like evolutionary states come and go; do-do to Archaeopteryx…etc. That was a conclusion or finality of sort. Hence, a perfect experiment for the world. Hence, have you ever heard of an amazing experiment that the EARTH could perform? Truth. Humanity gives us this resource. Humanity gives us the space to define what we want, when we want it and how it is dished…humanity is the future. We define humanity. Our changing actions will grieve with science and humanity and that related interaction.
_______________________________________________________________

Laughing. Laughing. Humanity was rhetorical and rite. It was a round and round cycle. The definers and definers of humanity could grasp the idea that “ they were it ” for the time and place. They could read, write, express themselves and problem solve. That was it. Laughing and humanity was zapped and seeped. Laughing and humanity was about the problem. As affect, the problem led to something. It was more than a critique of materials and methods. It was re-invented scene science.
The scene had been written and the abstract was complete. Question, Hypothesis, Materials, Methods, Data, Analysis and Conclusion.