In Re Doe In Re Doe

In Re Doe

1983.C02.40223 711 F.2D 1187

    • £0.49
    • £0.49

Publisher Description

We are called upon to decide whether a grand jury has the power to subpoena a physicians W-2 forms, prescription forms and patient files despite his claims that the Fifth Amendment and doctor-patient privilege shield these records from production. A grand jury sitting in the Southern District of New York is investigating what it believes to be a sham medical clinic that served as a front for the illegal sale of ten of thousands of "quaaludes" in New York City. The records subpoenaed are those of a psychiatrist allegedly associated with the clinic. The Court is unanimous in its view that the doctors W-2 and prescription forms are subject to the subpoenas duces tecum issued against him and that for his failure to produce them he was properly held in civil contempt. We are divided only on the issue of patient files in the doctors possession.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1983
29 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.9
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

City of New York v. Tug Mcallister Brothers City of New York v. Tug Mcallister Brothers
1938
Osborne v. Salvation Army. Osborne v. Salvation Army.
1939
Wold v. State Wold v. State
1973
United States v. Fatico United States v. Fatico
1978
National Labor Relations Board v. Paskesz National Labor Relations Board v. Paskesz
1969
In re Corporation In re Corporation
1939