Ethical, Evidence-Based Guidelines for Contraceptive Use in Research (Report) Ethical, Evidence-Based Guidelines for Contraceptive Use in Research (Report)

Ethical, Evidence-Based Guidelines for Contraceptive Use in Research (Report‪)‬

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2010, Sept-Oct, 32, 5

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

Research ethics review committees commonly approve protocols that require women of childbearing potential to use one or two means of birth control while enrolled in clinical drug trials, and sometimes the means of birth control are specified (e.g., oral contraceptives or an intrauterine device). The purpose of a contraception requirement is to protect a developing fetus from exposure to drugs that might harm it by preventing pregnancy for the duration of the trial. Some commentators contend that it is ethically unacceptable to require women of childbearing potential to use contraception as a condition of trial participation because such a requirement violates women's autonomy and is inconsistent with women's well-being, as some forms of contraception carry health risks for women. These risks are all the more significant when contraceptive use is unnecessary, as when there is no risk of pregnancy. For others, mandated contraception for women of childbearing potential is ethically defensible on the grounds that while women might benefit from participating in clinical drug trials, they should not expose a potential fetus to drugs that could be harmful. In an effort to balance the duty to respect women's autonomy and well-being and the (contested) duty to protect potential fetuses from possible research harms, many research ethics review committees have developed policies regarding contraceptive use for women who participate in clinical trials. One published policy is that of the IRB at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC). (1) This policy uses the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) categories for prescription drug labeling for drugs used during pregnancy "as thresholds for levels of required contraception." (2) The underlying reasoning is that the current FDA labeling categories (A, B, C, D, X) (3)--in place to protect actual fetuses from potential harm in the context of therapeutic treatment--can reasonably be used to protect potential fetuses from potential harm in the context of clinical research.

GENERE
Salute, mente e corpo
PUBBLICATO
2010
1 settembre
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
23
EDITORE
Hastings Center
DIMENSIONE
221,8
KB

Altri libri di IRB: Ethics & Human Research

A Consent Form Template for Phase I Oncology Trials. A Consent Form Template for Phase I Oncology Trials.
2009
Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report) Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report)
2010
Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences. Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences.
2009
Does Size Matter? Salience of Follow-up Payments in Drug Abuse Research. Does Size Matter? Salience of Follow-up Payments in Drug Abuse Research.
2007
Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB. Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB.
2009
Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field) Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field)
2009