Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field) Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field)

Research Ethics Consultation at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (In the Field‪)‬

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2009, March-April, 31, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrizione dell’editore

Although many hospitals have long offered a clinical ethics consultation service to their physicians, patients, and allied health professionals, formal ethics consultation in the research setting is a relatively new development. (1) This article describes the Research Ethics Consulting Service (RECS) that was launched in March 2005 at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH). Johns Hopkins University was one of 142 institutions that received funding in fiscal year 2002 to develop programs to "strengthen the oversight of human subject research." (2) After obtaining the capacity development grant, the authors--faculty members at the Bergman Institute of Bioethics (BI) with appointments in the school of public health--conducted a needs assessment to determine what types of continuing education in research ethics would be most useful to school faculty. The universal preference was for a consulting service that would give faculty the opportunity, in real-time, to discuss challenging ethical issues they faced at various stages of their research, with emphasis on issues particular to their work. The authors determined early in discussions with faculty and key senior administrators that the goal of such a consulting service would be to assist investigators (whether faculty, staff, or students) in navigating the ethical challenges that might arise in the design, conduct, or analysis of research projects involving human subjects. At the end of the six-month pilot period, the JHSPH Office for Research Subjects (ORS) decided to provide salary support for the authors to manage the RECS as a regular component in the school of public health. The focus of this article is to show how the RECS is organized, how it responds to and manages requests for consultations, and what types of consultations the service has provided since its inception.

GENERE
Salute, mente e corpo
PUBBLICATO
2009
1 marzo
LINGUA
EN
Inglese
PAGINE
17
EDITORE
Hastings Center
DIMENSIONE
219,1
KB

Altri libri di IRB: Ethics & Human Research

A Consent Form Template for Phase I Oncology Trials. A Consent Form Template for Phase I Oncology Trials.
2009
Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report) Comprehension and Informed Consent: Assessing the Effect of a Short Consent Form (Report)
2010
Ethical, Evidence-Based Guidelines for Contraceptive Use in Research (Report) Ethical, Evidence-Based Guidelines for Contraceptive Use in Research (Report)
2010
Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences. Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences.
2009
Does Size Matter? Salience of Follow-up Payments in Drug Abuse Research. Does Size Matter? Salience of Follow-up Payments in Drug Abuse Research.
2007
Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB. Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB.
2009