![E. Bert Riddle v. State Florida](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![E. Bert Riddle v. State Florida](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
E. Bert Riddle v. State Florida
FL.40380; 36 So. 2d 172, 160 Fla. 652 (1948)
-
- $9.00
-
- $9.00
Descripción editorial
I think the evidence in this case is legally insufficient to support the conviction. Considered in sum, I think it is more
consistent with a frame-up on the defendant than it is with his guilt. It is far short of showing a "lewd" attempt to "fondle"
the prosecutrix, and, while on trial for a felony with a sex aspect, it is about to condemn defendant to infamy and dishonor
I am convinced that it would not be sufficient to condemn him for chicken stealing, a trial for which would be governed by
the same rules of evidence.